🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different electoral districts – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.