🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor always experienced the burden of her parent’s reputation. As the daughter of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous UK composers of the turn of the 20th century, her reputation was cloaked in the long shadows of history.

The First Recording

Not long ago, I contemplated these memories as I made arrangements to record the inaugural album of her concerto for piano composed in 1936. With its emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and bold rhythms, Avril’s work will grant music lovers fascinating insight into how the composer – an artist in conflict who entered the world in 1903 – imagined her reality as a artist with mixed heritage.

Shadows and Truth

Yet about legacies. It requires time to acclimate, to see shapes as they actually appear, to distinguish truth from misrepresentation, and I was reluctant to face Avril’s past for a while.

I had so wanted her to be her father’s daughter. To some extent, she was. The idyllic English tones of parental inspiration can be observed in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only review the titles of her father’s compositions to see how he identified as not only a flag bearer of English Romanticism as well as a advocate of the African heritage.

This was where Samuel and Avril began to differ.

American society judged Samuel by the brilliance of his compositions instead of the his ethnicity.

Samuel’s African Roots

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – started to lean into his heritage. At the time the Black American writer this literary figure visited the UK in that era, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He adapted the poet’s African Romances into music and the next year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral composition that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an international hit, notably for Black Americans who felt vicarious pride as the majority judged Samuel by the brilliance of his art instead of the his background.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Fame did not reduce his beliefs. During that period, he attended the pioneering African conference in London where he met the Black American thinker WEB Du Bois and observed a series of speeches, such as the subjugation of the Black community there. He was an activist to his final days. He kept connections with early civil rights leaders such as Du Bois and this leader, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even discussed matters of race with President Theodore Roosevelt during an invitation to the White House in 1904. Regarding his compositions, the scholar reflected, “he made his mark so high as a musician that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He passed away in 1912, at 37 years old. However, how would the composer have made of his child’s choice to work in South Africa in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to S African Bias,” ran a headline in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the right policy”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she did not support with the system “in principle” and it “should be allowed to run its course, guided by good-intentioned people of diverse ethnicities”. If Avril had been more aligned to her father’s politics, or raised in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about this system. But life had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a English document,” she remarked, “and the government agents never asked me about my ethnicity.” So, with her “fair” skin (as Jet put it), she moved among the Europeans, buoyed up by their praise for her renowned family member. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the Cape Town university and led the broadcasting ensemble in that location, featuring the bold final section of her composition, titled: “In memory of my Father.” Although a accomplished player herself, she never played as the soloist in her work. Rather, she invariably directed as the maestro; and so the apartheid orchestra played under her baton.

Avril hoped, according to her, she “may foster a change”. Yet in the mid-1950s, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials discovered her Black ancestry, she had to depart the land. Her British passport failed to safeguard her, the UK representative urged her to go or face arrest. She returned to England, embarrassed as the scale of her naivety dawned. “This experience was a painful one,” she expressed. Increasing her embarrassment was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from the country.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these legacies, I perceived a known narrative. The story of being British until it’s challenged – which recalls Black soldiers who fought on behalf of the British in the World War II and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Along with the Windrush era,